Need an argumentative essay on English Literature Lesson 5. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.hen this culture is overtaken by a stronger or more dominant one while one of the worst, again in

Need an argumentative essay on English Literature Lesson 5. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.

hen this culture is overtaken by a stronger or more dominant one while one of the worst, again in my opinion, is Kafka’s “Letter to His Father.”

It is true that Nervous Conditions seems to be written by an immature writer unsure of just what she is trying to say, but this does not automatically disqualify it as having no literary merit.

As the story of Tambu is related, the author allows the audience to relax into the character, get to know her from the inside out and to see the world through her eyes. This vision is limited and is presented as such in the novel, which some might view as a weakness, but I view as a strength. By presenting the world through the eyes of a young girl living through the experiences of a third world culture trying to assimilate itself into what they perceive as a more sophisticated and desirable culture, the surprises and observations she makes are very enlightening. The way in which the modern culture affects her family and her life is also illuminating whether one has actually grown up within the modern culture or is experiencing it for the first time. The insights offered, whether intentional or not, into the gender and cultural divide presented fill this novel with a great deal to think about and general issues that affect a great number of people regardless of their upbringing, social condition or experience.

By contrast, I felt Kafka’s letter to his father was a work of considerably less quality because of its reduction in universal experience and sometimes confusing use of rhetoric. It is hard to blame Kafka for this failing as he wasn’t necessarily writing for the public but was instead making a bid for his father’s approval and understanding. The ideas contained within this work were not as accessible to the general public, some needing a bit of background information on the author in order to understand, and these ideas were continually being apologized for, which detracted from the piece to a great degree