Need an argumentative essay on NIH Protecting Human Research Participants Course. Needs to be 1 pages. Please no plagiarism.Download file to see previous pages Under the principles of beneficence, the

Need an argumentative essay on NIH Protecting Human Research Participants Course. Needs to be 1 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Under the principles of beneficence, the research should pursue good over harm in a fair and within a respectful framework.

In my institution, we carry research in three areas including orthopedics, psychiatry and neuroscience. All these areas involve human participants, and thus issues of minimal protection come to play. Because of this recognition of protecting human participants, our institution has complied with some requirements. More importantly, NIH Office of Extramural Reserach, (2010) states that an Ethical Review Board (ERB) is tasked with reviewing research proposals to ensure they are within the ethics and moral framework (Fiske &amp. Hauser, 2014).

The institutional review board is made up of four members from diverse disciplines. This is quite relevant because the formation of ERBs should be based on a multiplicity of professional knowledge. Besides, this committee meet twice every week to execute their mandate. This again is another prove that they act in line with the provisions of IRBs as stipulated by the National Institute of Health (NIH). Furthermore, they are involved in reviewing ongoing research and those with changes during the stretch of research. They are powerful committee that can evoke an ongoing study if there are substantial grounds to believe that an ongoing study has violated these principles. From these functions and organization, our ERB meets the NIH minimal protection of human participants.