Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Need an argumentative essay on Questions based on different handouts. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.Download file to see previous pages... Questions based on different handoutsThe mandate
Need an argumentative essay on Questions based on different handouts. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.
Download file to see previous pages...Questions based on different handouts
The mandate for Palestine did fulfill this point in its recognition of the connection of the Jewish, historically, with the Palestine and by asserting that a national home be constructed for them in Palestine. This declaration put into consideration the interests of the concerned population, in this case, the Jewish population. The Mandate for Palestine managed to clearly offer a clear distinction between political rights with regards to the Jewish civil and religious rights and self-determination as an emerging polity, referring to guaranteed of equal individual freedoms to non-Jewish residents within select communities and as individuals. However, the mandate failed to satisfy point 5 of the Woodrow Wilson Fourteen Points by failing to mention, not even once, Arabs as a people. The document fails to identify and granting any rights to Arabs as it did the Jews, thus not satisfying the requirement of putting into consideration all interests of concerned population.
Point 12 of the Woodrow Wilson Fourteen Points asserts that, “Turkish portions of the current Ottoman Empire should be guaranteed of a secure sovereignty, and the other nationalities, now under the Turkish rule, must be guaranteed of an absolutely unmolested autonomous development opportunity and undoubted security of life, and the Dardanelles should permanently be opened for a free passage for ships and that trade of all nations should be under international guarantees”....
The Palestine mandate fails to satisfy this point-point 12 of the Woodrow Wilson Fourteen Points-by entrusting a Mandatory, in this case, Great Britain, to have full power of administration and legislation-according to article 1 of the mandate- over the Palestine Territory, formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire. In so doing, the mandate goes against the principle of guaranteeing secure sovereignty. The Palestine Mandate also seems to satisfy point 12, at least according to article 2, which states that, “…for safeguarding religious and civil rights of all Palestine inhabitants regardless or religion and race,” requirement that undoubted security for life should be provided for all those nationalities under the Turkish rule (Halsall, “Modern History Sourcebook: League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, July 24, 1922”). Article 3 of the mandate also encourages local autonomy, which is in line with pint 12 of the Woodrow Wilson Fourteen Points, which advocates for equal, unmolested autonomous development opportunities. Additionally, article 5 of the mandate satisfies point 12 requirement of guaranteed sovereignty by advocating for the mandate to ensure that no territory in Palestine is leased or ceded, or placed under the control of another government’s foreign power in any way.
