Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Need an argumentative essay on Sure Thing, by David Ives. Needs to be 1 pages. Please no plagiarism.I believe this shows hope and the possibility of finding the right person to love and cherish, despi
Need an argumentative essay on Sure Thing, by David Ives. Needs to be 1 pages. Please no plagiarism.
I believe this shows hope and the possibility of finding the right person to love and cherish, despite possible failures along the way.
The bell symbolizes the ending of the current conversation, but also acts as the cue for starting a new one. It sort of resets the play, giving the characters the opportunity to move towards the correct answer of love, marriage and affection towards each other. In a practical sense, the bell acts as a signal for a wrong answer. As stated before, this would not be possible in real life and shows that people are generally very picky or judgmental in conversations with strangers. These answers also show what society expects of people, especially with regards to the questions about university education etc, and the value of persistence, deemed necessary by society in any developing relationship (Kennedy, Gioia, 2007, p. 1268).
The main conflict in “Antigone” is between the individual and the power of the state, along with raising pertinent questions about tyranny, pride and issues of gender. It is clear that both Antigone and Creon can lay claim to the title of protagonist in the play. On a simple level, Antigone is the protagonist because the play is named after her, and leads forward due to her actions. On the other hand, even Creon through his later actions, could be justified as being the protagonist. However, I believe that the protagonist is Antigone and Creon fulfills the role of the antagonist. The climax of this play would definitely be the suicides of Antigone and Haemon. The theme of the play is the conflict between “natural law” and manmade law and the role of pride in this conflict.
I believe that the play brings into focus ideas that are essential in today’s world as well. It questions whether precedent is more valuable than progress and asks questions about the varying approaches to law and customs. Further, it also questions the
