Need an argumentative essay on Writing Critically: Supporting/Opposing an Argument 40 points. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.Download file to see previous pages... The research delves into

Need an argumentative essay on Writing Critically: Supporting/Opposing an Argument 40 points. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.

The research delves into the veracity of the misconception. Misconceptions do occur, especially regarding eXtreme Programming capacity. Discussion Support for Ambler’s Argument I support the Ambler’s argument stating “there are several misconceptions that people seem to have regarding modeling in eXtreme Programming (XP) project (http://www.agilemodeling.com/). ” I steadfastly believe it is correct in its assertions and I can support and develop my claims with evidence. Discussing one of the misconceptions, the Ambler detractors insist that the programmer does not create a model in eXtreme Programming. The detractors based their biased opinions on people who are experts in eXtreme Programming (XP). The author classifies forum opinions as second-hand knowledge. Just like other issues, there will always be differing opinions on any topics. Thus, one person will rely on seemingly “expert” opinions. However, the individual should have verified the reasons behind such self-proclaimed expert. The individual should have verified the “expert” credentials of the opinion giver. Author evidences his own expert comment by stating that the “expert” opinions were given in an internet forum. Anyone can register in the forum. A forum is usually a free for all discussion of any topic under the sun. Consequently, every member can give a comment on any topic. Consequently, several experts give their professional opinion on the thread topic. However, another misinformed or uneducated forum member gives one’s biased opinion on the topic. Further, there are several reasons for the biased opinions. First, the “expert” is selling a competitors’ products and services. The competitor earns affiliate commissions from selling another product or service. The “expert” uses the simple marketing strategy of creating “let the buyer beware” sales presentations. Like in normal sales situations, the prospective customers should not take the seller’s presentation hook line &amp. sinker, as bible truth. Instead, the prospective customer should do one’s own research on the product. Having mentioned that, the forum members should not accept the comments of the forum “expert”. Instead, the forum members should conduct one’s own research on the eXtreme Programming’s capacities. Furthermore, Ambler states that the questionable sources of information generate mediocre eXtreme Programming knowledge. The individual gathers information from online resources. However, many of the online book authors are not experts in their field. The author may have gathered information from individuals who are not experts in the field of eXtreme Programming. Thus, the theory of garbage in, garbage out (GIGO) crops up. When the author gathers wrong information, the author creates a book that offers unwarranted concepts or postulates. To resolve the issue, the book readers should scrutinize the book author’s credentials. The reader should determine if the author is an expert in the filed of eXtreme Programming. If the author convincingly shows unquestionable knowledge on eXtreme Programming, then the reader can accept the proposed concepts of the author. On the other hand, the reader should take the views of a person who is not an expert on the topic as below the level of professional opinion. In both cases, the book reader should refer to other professional books on the topic. The reader has the democratic right to gather differing concepts on the subject. Next, the reader can do experiments on the topic in order to ascertain the veracity of all the opinions. After a painstaking research of many related professional resources, the reader can finally state, “the author is correct”.