Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
overtime pay
We really need quality work
Then, write a 2-3-page analysis in which you complete the following: Summarize the case. Describe the central issues of the case and specifically address the company's alleged errors. Describe the decisions that were made and the outcome of the case. Clarify your opinion regarding the reasons why this employee should or should not have been paid overtime wages; describe how the company can avoid similar charges in the future; and describe how the court applied these criteria to the facts of the case to reach its decision. Additional Requirements Written Communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA Formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. Font and Font Size: Times New Roman, 12 point, double-spaced. Use Microsoft Word to complete the assessment. Length: A minimum of two pages, excluding title page and reference page (150300 words per question).
Overtime Pay Issue Case Analysis 5
Write a 2–3-page analysis in which you summarize a case involving overtime and related pay issues, identify the central issues related to the alleged errors, and describe the outcome of the case. Offer your opinion of the reasons the employee should or should not have been paid overtime wages.
In this assessment, your challenge is to investigate pay and benefits issues as they relate to the law and conflict in the workplace. You will review the issues of pay and benefits and how they can be some of the hottest issues in human resources today.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
· Competency 1: Examine the effect of the employment process on current work environments.
o Describe the issues in the case.
Competency 3: Apply the laws and safety issues in the workplace.
o Describe your opinion on the decision regarding overtime pay.
Competency 5: Create strategies for recovery.
o Describe the decisions that affected the outcome of the case.
Use the Capella library and the Internet to find and research a case involving overtime and related pay issues.
Then, write a 2–3-page analysis in which you complete the following:
· Summarize the case.
· Describe the central issues of the case and specifically address the company's alleged errors.
· Describe the decisions that were made and the outcome of the case.
· Clarify your opinion regarding the reasons why this employee should or should not have been paid overtime wages; describe how the company can avoid similar charges in the future; and describe how the court applied these criteria to the facts of the case to reach its decision.
Additional Requirements
· Written Communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
· APA Formatting: Resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines.
· Font and Font Size: Times New Roman, 12 point, double-spaced. Use Microsoft Word to complete the assessment.
· Length: A minimum of two pages, excluding title page and reference page (150–300 words per question).
Suggested Resources
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.
Library Resources
The following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course:
· Bednar, J. (2014). Tackling the gender wage gap. BusinessWest, 30(23), 53, 63.
· Equal pay timeline. (2014). Congressional Digest, 93(5), 2, 32.
· Pay equity overview. (2014). Congressional Digest, 93(5), 3–7, 32.
· Subminimum wage for persons with disabilities under fire. (2012). Payroll Manager's Report, 16(10), 11–12.
- @
- 1 order completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $30.00. See answer's preview
************ *** IssuesName:Course:Instructor:Date: Introduction *** purpose of this ***** ** ** **** a ******* ** a case that ******** ******** *** ******* payment issues *** ******* **** **** *** ******* ****** ********** *** ****** ******* *** ******** *** *** **** ***** Again ** opinion ** *** *** ******** ****** ** ****** *** **** **** paid *** ***** ** overtime shall ** presented *** task of *** ***** ******** ** ** ******** ******** *** ******** and *** **** ****** ** law *** *** ******** are **** ** *** **** *********** ****** in the ***** resource ***** *** case ***** ********* ** **** * Farmers’ Insurance ******** *** *** *** *** *** ****** *** **** is ***** ********* *** ****** overtime *** ******* they *** ** *** ***** ********* ** *** ***** rightful wagesSummary of the caseOn *** ******* **** **** *** thousand employees and ******* ******* ********* ******** ***** * **** ******** **** *** company ******* ***** employment agreement in order to **** them ***** ******** ***** *** ******* **** seeking ** *** *********** ******** ****** from **** ******* * **** present(Bell & ***** ***** Farmers ******* **** *** ******** representatives **** in administrative ******** *** thus **** ******** **** ***** *********** *** *** ******** ***** the ********** industrial ******* ************* superior ***** ******* ****** gave ******* ************ *** *** ************** ****** ******** that **** **** *** ** be ******** **** *** ******** payment **** *** entered ******* ***** giving **** ** attorney *** ***** ** appeal held to the decision **** the ********** **** *** nonexempt ******* and ******* the **** for ******* ** *** fees to ******** *** ********* ******* ** a ****** ********* *** ** order ** ********* the ***** The ****** court however ******** the ******* Jury ********* returned * ******** verdict realizing that overtime payment **** *** **** *** **** overtime *** **** to *** ***** ******** with ************* double-overtime *** **** court ******* ** ** order ********* ************* reviewed ******** ** ************ which was subject ** ** ******* *** *** ********* ******* **** ** appeal(Bell ***** ***** ****************** the previous ****** ******* **** ****** *************** of the insurance *********** *** were ******* ************ *** *** overtime **** ********* ******* *** precluded by *** *** of *** **** dogma Department ** ***** ****** ** ******* ******** ** ** *** *********** offering insurance services ** **** ** ****** ** *********** in *** ***** of ******* in law ***** **** *************** on *** ***** *** *** *** *** *** ********** dichotomy of ************** ** production *** federal ***** ******** on by *** ********* ******* were ** **** with *** ******** ******** of the ***** ** *********** ***** ***** ******* *** ******* **** the mentioned **** **** that the ******** **** *** exempt ********* ** ********** *** **** ********* *** **** part ** ********** *** **** **** ******** ** *** **** ** they **** ******* to **** and **** laws ********** ** ******** **** **** *** provided ***** ******* ** **** *********** *** plaintiffs *** *** ****** of ******* ************ ** well as *** ******* *** *** ********** **** *** **** ** the ********** ***** ***** 2016)Opinion *** *********************** ** me ** is * ********** thing to *** **** * ********** ******** **** involved **** ***** ****** of individuals *** ******** *** *** **** *** monetary compensation that the plaintiffs **** *********** because ** * result ** this **** *** ****** ***** were ****** And ***** ** they ******** ** be compensated * ***** ******** ******** ** get paid *** ***** minute ****** ****** in ** office ** ******** **** *** ******** is ********* ***** ****** were not ** administrative ***** *** ********* **** were *** ******** **** *** law of wage and hour It also ****** reveal *** ********* ******** ******* as ** ******** ** ******** ******* ** **** they *** *** be compensatedThe company *** avoid such cases ** the ****** ** ******* ******** *** ********* ** differentiate the ************** **** **** those *********** costs ** **** * ***** **** can be *** ******* ***** ********* who *** ****** **** **** ** **** **** and ***** *** *** *** *** ******* ******** *** **** ** ********* *** ********* ** work overtime without ************ Therefore ** ****** ***** ******** responsibilities to *********** if ** ***** *** **** ** the ************** 2013) **** *********** *** **** ****** familiarize ****** with *** ******* **** *** ***** ********* the ******* **** ******* *** ****** adjusters ***** **************** ********** the **** ** Bell v ********** ********* Exchange *** Cal *** *** 715 (2004) ****** as one of *** ********* **** employees **** suffered ** *** hands ** ********* *** ******* want ** pay ******** ***** *** **** ******* set * ********* **** *** been **** ** the ***** ****** to ****** ** ******* ***** Establishment ** **** ***** **** *** ***** existence to **** case ** was a good ****** *** *** ************ in the **** ** *** employees **** **** ***** *** ****** ** employees are ********* *** ****** ** *********** by *** ********* ** **** as *** *************************** J ***** Paris M-L ****** ************ ************** ****** : ************** ****** in * changing ********* ********** Glos * *********** Massachusetts: ****** ***** ******************* * * ****** 19th annual ********** Law ********* [Mechanicsburg Pa] * Pennsylvania *** ***********