Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
PITFALLS OF JOB EVALUATION METHODS
There are generally three methods used for evaluating jobs: Ranking. Classification. Point method. Prepare a short description of each method, including your responses to the following: What are the main features of each evaluation method? (In other words, what is a general description of each method?) Examine each method by looking at its potential downside. What are the essential weaknesses in each of these evaluation methods? Describe a situation in which each method would not be effective for a business. For example, when would ranking be either impractical or unfair? When would the point method be too complicated to be effective in evaluating work for creating a salary structure? Be sure to use proper APA (6th edition) style and formatting.
Pitfalls of Job Evaluation Methods Assessment 2
Prepare a short description of each of three methods of job evaluation, including each method's main features, essential weaknesses, and a situation in which it would not be effective for a business.
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
· Competency 2: Evaluate the components and implementation of base-pay programs.
o Examine the weaknesses of the ranking method for evaluating jobs.
o Examine the weaknesses of the classification method for evaluating jobs.
o Examine the weaknesses of the point method for evaluating jobs.
Suggested Resources:The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.
Library ResourcesThe following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course:
Eargle, F. L. (2005). Job evaluation and wage administration for beginners. Office Solutions, 22(6), 26–28.
Harris, M. M. (2007). Job evaluation. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 395-397). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Reference.
· Job evaluation. (2006). In Collins dictionary of business. London, England: Collins.
· Muhammad, A. E. (2011). An analytical approach to the unequivocal need of organizations for job evaluation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(18), 8–13.
Course Library Guide
A Capella University library guide has been created specifically for your use in this course. You are encouraged to refer to the resources in the BUS-FP4043 – Compensation and Benefits Management Library Guide to help direct your research.
Internet Resources
Access the following resources by clicking the links provided. Please note that URLs change frequently. Permissions for the following links have been either granted or deemed appropriate for educational use at the time of course publication.
· U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (1991). The classifier's handbook. Retrieved from http://www.opm.gov/fedclass/clashnbk.pdf
o Chapter 2, "The Factor Evaluation System," discusses factors that are considered when assigning grades to nonsupervisory positions within the general schedule.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2010). Standard occupational classification. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/soc/home.htm
Bookstore Resources
The resources listed below are relevant to the topics and assessments in this course and are not required. Unless noted otherwise, these materials are available for purchase from the Capella University Bookstore. When searching the bookstore, be sure to look for the Course ID with the specific –FP (FlexPath) course designation.
· Newman, J. M., Gerhart, B., &Milkovich, G. (2017). Compensation (12th ed.). New
· York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Assessment Instructions
There are generally three methods used for evaluating jobs:
1. Ranking.
2. Classification.
3. Point method.
Prepare a short description of each method, including your responses to the following:
· What are the main features of each evaluation method? (In other words, what is a general description of each method?)
· Examine each method by looking at its potential downside. What are the essential weaknesses in each of these evaluation methods?
· Describe a situation in which each method would not be effective for a business. For example, when would ranking be either impractical or unfair? When would the point method be too complicated to be effective in evaluating work for creating a salary structure?
Be sure to use proper APA (6th edition) style and formatting.
5 pages
- @
- 1 order completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $50.00. See answer's preview
****************** ** *** ********** METHODSName:Course: Instructor:Date: IntroductionJob ********** is ** attempt to ********* and relate *** particular **** demands *** ********** *********** to the ********* without considering ** individual capacity *** skills ** *** ********* ********** **** ********* ***** * ********** ****** of ********** ** ****** in *** process as **** will **** ** ******** * ******* ********** *** ***** *** job adds ** *** ************ as **** ** knowing **** ** to ** changed ** **** *** *** ********** ** also ***** in *********** ** ******** **** structure in the ************ ** is possible ** ****** *** ****** **** using ****** *** jobs requirements ****** **** ***** *** *** value to do the **** ************ the wage ***** *********** ********** ** the ******* **** reflect *** ********** **** ***** ** *** ******** Thus the method ** ********* **** both ******** *** ******** aspects ** *** payment ***** ******* ***** *** ******** in some methods **** ** ******** jobs **** *** ********* ** *** section **** ******* ** **** ************ ************* ****** is the simplest ****** ** evaluating **** According ** ranking process jobs are classified **** ******* ** ****** following *** ***** ** ***** *** quality ** **** ** *** ******* **** *** **** be *********** ********* ** ***** *********** difficulty *** **** are evaluated ** * ***** ***** ** ****** *** ************ ** them on ******* ******** ** *** *** ********* ** *** ******* method **** on *** ** *** list **** *********** value ** *** ************ ** ******** ** *** **** **** in *** **** ***** ** ********** to add ****** value to *** ********** of *** ************ *** jobs *** ****** ** **** ********** and **** *** jobs ****** ** ***** department *** ********** to **** the ******* company ******* The payment ** ******** *** wages ****** ** ********** ***** *** levels(LIVY 2017)Ranks *** **** to develop *** vast *** complex ***** *** therefore ** might *** be appropriate to ** ******* in **** ********* *** **** ** ranking where there *** * ***** ****** ** ******* ***** ** ************** and ********* *********** *** ***************** ** **** ****** may **** ** shown by *** **** **** it is ****** ********** other than objective; ********* many employees *** ** dissatisfied **** ********* ***** ******* *********** This method **** *** *** scientific ******* when ******** therefore there is the **** *** developing ****** ******* *** ************** can **** ** *********** ******* *** ** legally ********** *** ******** ** the *** *********** ***** ****** with *** ***** *** created *** therefore ********* it ********** *** ********** *********** for ********** * ******** might **** ** ******* evaluation ********* ** *** ******* ** an ******** ******* ** ****** the *** ****** ** **** *** *** **** building aspect ** ******** ***** ** ******** ** *** **************** ********** ************ ***** ** * *********** that the *** **** **** ***** ********* *** the **** *** categorized(Lussier & ****** ************ this job evaluation ****** ** ************* ** *** are: ***** ** assessment *** *** ************* *** where there ** ** need ** ********* ****** *** grades ** ****** ******** *** ranking ***** ** *********** ********* ** *** *** *** not *** hierarchy itself *** can ********** corruption *** favoritism ******* lack ** standard ******** ***** ***** **** method unpleasant ** it **** *** **** * ******** way ** ********* job *********** ********* ** ******* from unmanageability *** *** ranking *** ****** ** *********** ** *** ************** ** ***** some *********** ** ******* ** familyClassification ******************** method commonly ***** ** ******* ****** **** * ************* number ** *** ********** The groups *** **** assigned ** different ******* *** ****** *** *** ******* *** ** * result ** **** ******* Some common *********** is ********** ***** might be ********* knowledge ***** ** skills Once the grades ** *** **** are defined **** are ****** ** ***** ****** depending on *** **** they *** in **** *** ******** ************** *** give * ********* ** **** that **** **** ********* 2017):Grade I: *********** ******* levels ** this ***** *** ******* department ******* ******* ******* ****** ************** ** deputy ****** managerGrade II: ******* ********* This category may ******** *** ********** ******** clerks secretaries *** ***** **** **** require knowledge and ******************** III: this ***** ******** of ************ ********* **** ******** ********* **** ***** ** *** require expertise such ** technicians switchboard ********* or ************ *** **** category ** *** ********* ******** This ******** *** ****** workers ************ office ********** *** **** among others which ******* ** knowledge *** *** ********* ***** the ******* of *** senior *** holdersThe job ************ *** designed ** ***** ** ***** *** ********** in *** level ** skill *** grades ** *** ****** ***** reflect *** employees who **** ***** ************ from the ****** ********* ******* **** ****** ** *************** **** jobs *** *** ******* **** ***** ********** components *** **** are ********** as a ***** **** method depends ** *** ****** *** **************** taking a position **** **** *** conventional across *** **************** ***** Hendon 2013)However this ******** ******* **** ******* ****** **** ***** make it ************* for *** ** an ************ One jobs *** ** ******** ** *** **** ******** even ****** ***** **** **** ********* ************* for *** ******* ******* ** *** ****** **** the *** has It ** ********** to **** down *** characteristics ** ******* **** and **** ******* might ****** **** management *** *** ******* ********* **** Again this method overgeneralizes *** ******* *********** between various **** *** *** ****** *********** ****** there ** * ******** ** classifying *** job ******* ***** subjective ******** when some individual *************** are *** ******* ** *** *** ********** ************* *** ***************** ** **** method ** *** ********** ** ********* ** its ************ ** *** ************ ******** is **** ************* when ********** ******* are ******** ** ** ********** ******* For instance when *** *** ****** ****** **** a ****** ** ******* of ********** **** this ****** ***** *** appropriate *** ** ** comparatively ***** **** ** ************* ***** *** ***** is ***** *** ************** method ** ****** ** **** ************** results **** ** ******* ** ******* ********** ********* ** ******** **** **** ** * ******* amount ** *** characteristics *** with ** ******** ** *** *** ************ ******** the ******* ** **** ********** ****** ***** ** *************** *********** method is ** *** ********** **** **** *** analytical methods ***** *** *** ******** *** **** ****** This *** evaluation ********* ** *** **** ****** ******* ** *** industry Points *** ******** ** various varied factors **** as ********* skills hazards roles *** other ******* **** may ************ * ******* job ******* *** ***** weights ********* ** *** **** ****** *** *** performance *** ******* ******** to * ******* *** *** then ********** *** posts **** *** **** ****** ** ******** *** **** ****** ** *** **** salary ******* ***** ****** *** ******** ** *** ******* ****** Due to **** ****** **** be ****** ** ** ********* *** *** ***** The *** value ******** converted ** ***** ***** ********* ** *** ************* formulaPoint method ******** a **** level ** ********* to ******** **** **** ******** is both * scientific *** a ********* ******* where ** ******** ********** to ******* ** The method uses the predetermined ***** ** grades **** *** ****** ** ** ********* ** **** *** ********* ***** ******* ******** ***** ************* ******** ********* ********** ******** to ********* it *** ********* it *** affect *** ****** process of evaluation *** ******** **** ***** ****** *** pay **** *** a ********** category of ********* like ********** ** ******* ******* ******** cannot ********** **** method; therefore *** ******** might not **** ******* *** they **** ***** a ********** pay ***** **** may lead to ******** uncertainty ***** *** ********** affect ***** *********** The ****** also ******* * *** ** secretarial **** in ********* *** ****** ****** ** ******* ************ method ** ********** is **** said to ****** from ******** ** ******** being ************ with ***** ******* **** ** ************** ****** ********* ********* ** ******* insufficient ** itself ***** this ************ ****** *** inflexibility ** because ** does not ***** *** ******* ******** dynamics ** ** ******** in *** **** **************** ***** ****** ***** ****** this approach ****** a ******* ** *********** ******** apart **** compensation benefits; this *** negatively ****** *** ******* **** ** *** ********** which is ** ********* the **** structure ** *** ************ *** ******* ***** change ******* ** **** ********** ******* which might lead ** **** ************ skill ******** ******************************** * * ***** Render * (2014) ********** ********** * sustainability *** ****** ***** ********** ******* ******** ******** * ****** *** ********** ********** ROUTLEDGELussier * * ***** ****** * * ****** Human ******** management * functions ************ skill *********** ******** Oaks: **** ******************
