PLAGIARISM FREE Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to teach you the post-conviction process: what happens in a criminal case once a jury finds the defendant guilty. The U.S. courts have

PLAGIARISM FREE

Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to teach you the post-conviction process: what happens in a criminal case once a jury finds the defendant guilty.

The U.S. courts have evolved from their humble beginnings of replicating English courts into a complex institution and an integral part of the justice system. For this assessment, you explore due process, types of courts, post-conviction review (relief), and sentencing as they relate to a specific court case you research. This assessment focuses on a few issues those in the criminal justice field face. You may be called on to consider these issues, too, if you pursue a career in criminal justice. This assignment is designed to teach you about what happens in the trial system after a guilty verdict is reached.

Imagine you are a judicial assistant for a superior court judge. As an alumnus, you’ve been asked by your university to write an article for the criminal justice department’s journal, read by students and alumni, based on a court case you’ve observed as part of your job.  

Conduct an internet search for a current example of a case to use for this assignment. Do not use any cases you have previously used for another assignment in this course.

Write a 700- to 1,050-word article for the journal and address the following:  

Crime Model  

Was the crime control or due process model of punishment used in the case? Do you agree with it? Explain your answer.  

What are some of the issues related to due process?  

Type of Court  

Which court dealt with the case? Was it a federal court or a state court?  

What are some of the challenges faced by federal courts?  

Sentencing  

What was the sentence given in the trial? What are the sentencing guidelines for the crime committed in the trial (refer to the sentencing guidelines of the state the trial was held)?  

What are some of the issues related to sentencing? Were there any issues raised in this case? If so, what were they? If not, in your opinion, could any issues have been raised?  

Post-Conviction Relief  

Was there an appeal or post-conviction relief (review)? What is the law in the state of the trial for post-conviction relief (review)?  

Differentiate post-conviction relief (review) and appeal. Compare post-conviction relief (review) to the Innocence Protection Act of 2004. Please do not confuse the Innocence Protection Act with the Innocence Project. You are to deal with the former, not the latter.

Remember: You must select a criminal case tried in the United States that went to a verdict of guilty. This way you can better address the rest of this assignment. Do not select a case that ended in a not guilty verdict. Do not select a case that ended in a plea bargaining and/or did not reach a guilty verdict.  If the decision by a jury was anything other than guilty (such as the Dahmer case, where he pled guilty and was found sane by the jury) it is not appropriate for this assignment. Again, if you write, "The defendant pled guilty" then this is not an appropriate case. Don't spend too much of your time discussing the facts of the case except as to how that might affect the sentencing and the due process or crime control model. Do not select a case merely because you think there was a miscarriage of justice and you want to express your outrage.  

This paper is designed to help teach you about what happens after a defendant is convicted-- the relief sought after the verdict and the appeals process after that. Again, if you have any questions about the case you want to use, please run it by me first.

Cite a minimum of 3 sources.

Format your paper according to APA guidelines.