Review the steps of the communication model in Ch. 1 of Business Communication Essentials (See Figure 1.3). Identify one personal or business communication scenario to describe each step of the communication process. Complete the Communications Process wo

Review the steps of the communication model in Ch. 1 of Business Communication Essentials (See Figure 1.3).

Identify one personal or business communication scenario to describe each step of the communication process.

Complete the Communications Process worksheet.

Compose a 700-word response detailing the paragraphs in the boxes provided.

• Discuss how mobile technology is changing the practice of business communication.
• Define ethical communication.
• Explain how the widespread use of social media has increased the attention given to the issue of transparency.
• Give an example of how mobile communication can be used to in a business setting. 

Format your assignment consistent with APA guidelines.

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

The Basic Communication Model Many variations of the communication process model exist, but these eight steps provide a practical overview (see Figure 1.3): The communication process starts with a sender having an idea and then encoding the idea into a message that can be transferred to a receiver. Decoding is a complex process; receivers often extract different meanings from messages than the meanings senders intended. The sender has an idea. Whether a communication effort will ultimately be effective starts right here and depends on the nature of the idea and the motivation for sending it. For example, if your motivation is to offer a solution to a problem, you have a better chance of crafting a meaningful message than if your motivation is merely to complain about a problem. The sender encodes the idea as a message. When someone puts an idea into a message, he or she is encoding it, or expressing it in words or images. Much of the focus of this course is on developing the skills needed to successfully encode your ideas into effective messages. The sender produces the message in a transmittable medium. With the appropriate message to express an idea, the sender now needs a communication medium to present that message to the intended audience. To update your boss on the status of a project, for instance, you might have a dozen or more media choices, from a phone call to an instant message to a slideshow presentation. The sender transmits the message through a channel. Just as technology continues to increase the number of media options, it also continues to provide new communication channels senders can use to transmit their messages. The distinction between medium and channel can get a bit murky, but think of the medium as the form a message takes (such as a Twitter update) and the channel as the system used to deliver the message (such as a mobile phone). The audience receives the message. If the channel functions properly, the message reaches its intended audience. However, mere arrival is not enough. For a message to truly be received, the recipient has to sense the presence of a message, select it from all the other messages clamoring for attention, and perceive it as an actual message (as opposed to random noise).10 Figure 1.3 The Basic Communication Process This eight-step model is a simplified view of how communication works in real life; understanding this basic model is vital to improving your communication skills. The receiver decodes the message. After a message is received, the receiver needs to extract the idea from the message, a step known as decoding. Even well-crafted, well-intentioned communication efforts can fail at this stage because extracting meaning is a highly personal process that is influenced by culture, experience, learning and thinking styles, hopes, fears, and even temporary moods. As you saw in Figure 1.1, receivers sometimes decode the same meaning the recipient intended, but sometimes they can decode—or re-create—entirely different meanings. Moreover, audiences tend to extract the meaning they expect to get from a message, even if it’s the opposite of what the sender intended.11 The receiver responds to the message. In most instances, senders want to accomplish more than simply delivering information. They often want receivers to respond in particular ways, whether it’s to invest millions of dollars in a new business venture or to accept management’s explanation for why the company can’t afford to give employee bonuses this year. Whether a receiver responds as the sender hopes depends on the receiver (a) remembering the message long enough to act on it, (b) being able to act on it, and (c) being motivated to respond. The receiver provides feedback. If a mechanism is available for them to do so, receivers can “close the loop” in the communication process by giving the sender feedback that helps the sender evaluate the effectiveness of the communication effort. Feedback can be verbal (using written or spoken words), nonverbal (using gestures, facial expressions, or other signals), or both. Just like the original message, however, this feedback from the receiver also needs to be decoded carefully. A smile, for example, can have many different meanings. Considering the complexity of this process—and the barriers and distractions that often stand between sender and receiver—it should come as no surprise that communication efforts frequently fail to achieve the sender’s objective. Fortunately, the better you understand the process, the more successful you’ll be. The Social Communication Model The basic model presented in Figure 1.3 illustrates how a single idea moves from one sender to one receiver. In a larger sense, it also helps represent the traditional model of much business communication, which was primarily defined by a publishing or broadcasting mindset. Externally, a company issued carefully scripted messages to a mass audience that often had few options for responding to those messages or initiating messages of their own. Customers and other interested parties had few ways to connect with one another to ask questions, share information, or offer support. Internally, communication tended to follow the same “we talk, you listen” model, with upper managers issuing directives to lower-level supervisors and employees. The social communication model is interactive, conversational, and usually open to all who wish to participate. However, in recent years, a variety of technologies have enabled and inspired a new approach to business communication. In contrast to the publishing mindset, this social communication model is interactive, conversational, and usually open to all who wish to participate. Audience members are no longer passive recipients of messages but active participants in a conversation. Social media have given customers and other stakeholders a voice they did not have in the past. And businesses are listening to that voice. In fact, one of the most common uses of social media among U.S. businesses is monitoring online discussions about a company and its brands.12 Inside companies, social media make it easier for employees to voice concerns and frustrations, increasing the chances that managers will address problems that are getting in the way of people doing their jobs.13 Instead of transmitting a fixed message, a sender in a social media environment initiates a conversation by sharing valuable information. This information is often revised and reshaped by the web of participants as they share it and comment on it. People can add to it or take pieces from it, depending on their needs and interests. Just as Web 2.0 signified the second generation of World Wide Web technologies (blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other social media tools you’ll read about in Chapter 6 ), Business Communication 2.0 is a convenient label for this approach to business communication. Figure 1.4 lists the significant differences between traditional and social models of business communication. Social media tools present some potential disadvantages that managers and employees need to consider. The social communication model offers many advantages, but it has a number of disadvantages as well. Potential problems include information overload, fragmented attention, information security risks, distractions that hurt productivity, the need to monitor and respond to numerous conversational threads, and blurring of the line between personal and professional lives, which can make it difficult for people to disconnect from work.14