Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
The Bioethics OP-ED Article Assignment Develop an ethical argument and one of the ways that public dialogue can be advanced on these issues is through the newspaper. The public needs cogent, prin
The Bioethics OP-ED Article Assignment
Develop an ethical argument and one of the ways that public dialogue can be advanced on these issues is through the newspaper. The public needs cogent, principled arguments to evaluate in place of the heated rhetoric that is often highlighted by the news media. For this assignment, you will write an OPED article (sometimes called a Commentary) for submission to a local newspaper. OP-ED is defined as denoting or printed on the page opposite the editorial page in a newspaper, devoted to commentary, feature articles, etc. It can be about any of the topics we have covered this semester such as abortion, assisted reproduction, physician assisted suicide, allocation of resources and advanced directives. The assignment can be NO SHORTER than 650 words and NO LONGER than 850 words. Your OP‐ED article should include all of the following elements: An opening paragraph which identifies the issue and “hooks” the reader A statement of your main thesis or point of view on the topic Your principled argument with at least 3 of the ethical principles discussed in the course A principled counter argument in response to an opposing point of view on the topic A solid conclusion
- @
- 1030 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $20.00. See answer's preview
*********** ***************** ****************** Should ** ******** ****************** *********** world has **** ********** public ********* ** ***** ****** cross ******* ** seek ***** death * *** ******* **** the *********** and ******* ******** ****************** ***** ** *** United States some ****** **** ******** Oregon and ******* allow *** ****************** suicide ** *** ****** ***** ********* ***** *** ****************** ******* ***** ****** ** **** *** ****** **** ** the ******** ******* standing **** ******* has ** ** ********* ** ******* *** relevant ******* principles **** ******** physician-assisted ***** to understand the differences ** ******** **** relate ** *** matterThose that support ****************** ***** **** the ********* of autonomy ** ********* ***** course *** ********* ** autonomy ** *********** ** ********** ***** ** allows *** *** ******** to ********** ** ***** ********** Autonomy requires ********** practitioners ** ******* *** choices the patients make **** ****** to ***** ********** ********* ** ** ***** Most *********** ******* ********** ************ to ****** *** consent of *** patient in critical ******* ********** *** problem **** *** ******** ****** when *** ******** **** * ******** **** ** *** ** ***** best ******** ********** **** * ************* **** ** offer *** **** **** on ***** ******** ****************** dying ** *** ******** ** which *** physician’s **** *** *** principle ** ******** conflict It ** ********* ** ******** **** ********* **** ****** **** ****** ************ **** ******* ********* *** ******** ** the ****** ********** ** ********** physician-assisted ***** ***** countries that ***** ****************** to place * **** value ** *** ******** of ***** ***************** ******* ****************** ***** *** mostly ***** ** *** ********** ** *********** *** non-maleficence *********** ****** that the ********* has to **** towards ********* *** patient from harm ********** ** ******** harm Physicians **** to refrain **** ******* ***** ******** *** so ****** ***** ******** ******** ** their ******** *********** ** mostly ** action that a physician takes ** ******* **** ** *** ******* *********** **** *** ********* ***** ******* ******* ** *** ******** ******** 2016) *************** ** ** ****** **** the ********* avoids ** ******* **** ** *** ******* Non-maleficence ***** ** ******* ******* **** ********* dying ******** ** ********* ***** ********** Societies **** ****** ***** ** *********** *** non-beneficence **** to ****** *** **** of ******** ***** ********** ******* *** ********* ** beneficence **** ******* *********** that ********* ******** dyingMost ********* revolve towards *** ***** ** **** *** murder The ***** ** **** ** * *********** ***** **** ** at *** center ** *** ******** ***** ****** Some people ******** **** ***** that ***** ** *** **** *** right to ** so ***** it ** ***** **** ** ** their **** *** **** have a right ** end it **** **** please Such ** argument is ****** ***** ******* ** ****** unethical and ******* in **** ********* **** *********** ***** should ***** an ********** ** choose ***** Even in **** ********* ** independent party *** ** ****** their ***** ***** ******** opposed ** *** idea ****** ******** ***** ** the **** level ** ****** Such comparisons are ******* since ****** ** **** for ******* ******* while assisted ***** is **** *** ********** and ** *** *********** ******* ****** with ******* ********** ***** ****** pain and *** subjected ** **** ******* of **** **** **** endure ********* ********* ***** **** **** ***** ***** ** ******** In such ************* ********** have ** ** **** *** *** ******* ** *** ******************** acceptance of ****************** dying **** depend on *** ******** ethical ********* ** ******* ****** should *** ********* **** countries **** ***** ** ****** ****************** dying *** subject ** death is ****** ********* *** each ******* **** *** laws **** ******* ** their dominant ******* *********** ** *** can blame *** ** the societies ***** *** ****** complicated and ******** *** yet to ********* ** ******* consensus on *** ******* ****** ****** however ********** autonomy **** judging *** ******* ******** should be ** *** part ** *** ******* and *** ********* ** ********* ****** ** forced ** ******* physician-assisted suicide **** it *********** ***** ******* and ** ******* ****** be ****** *** treatment when **** *** of sound mind ReferencesJohnson T A ****** ** Futility *** Beneficence **** ************* ***** ********* *** ******************* Responses ** ********** *** End-of-Life **** 161Radbruch * ***** * **** * Müller-Busch * Ellershaw J ** ***** * & ***** ******* ** the **** ****** Euthanasia *** ****************** suicide: * ***** ***** **** the ******** *********** *** ********** Care Palliative ******** ***** *******
