This assignment has 3 parts: What competencies were you able to develop in researching and writing the Comprehensive Project due in Unit 5? How did you leverage feedback from your peers in the Discuss

This assignment has 3 parts:

1. What competencies were you able to develop in researching and writing the Comprehensive Project due in Unit 5? How did you leverage feedback from your peers in the Discussion Board for Units 1- 4 in completing the Project? How will these competencies and knowledge support your career advancement in management?
2. An important skill to possess for risk management is the ability to recognize your own biases. How do you believe this knowledge will assist you in the risk management process?
3. When a risk event occurs in a project what steps do you believe should be taken to address the risk? Provide an example.

In your own words, please post a response to the Discussion Board and comment on other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

Discussion Board Reminders:

• Must have 3 posts: A main post and two replies to peers.
  • First post: Either your main post or a reply to others must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week.
  • Second and third post:Must be posted on a different day from the first post.
• Connect to content: At least 1 post must refer to course learning materials. See the Academic Resource on Discussion Boardsfor help with connecting to the content.
• Engaging in class discussions: For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the Academic Resource on Discussion Boards.

Assignment CriteriaProficient DescriptorPoints

Quality of Main Post

16PointsTotal

Student’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements:

• Responds completely to all of parts of discussion question (4 points)
• Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (4 points)
• Delivers a thoughtfulresponse demonstrating insights and reflections (4 points)
• Connects to both key content conceptsand personal experiences (4 points)

/16 pts.

Response to Peers

16 PointsTotal

Responds to a minimum of 2 peers (8 points per response)

• Substantiveresponse (4 points)
• Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (4 points):
  • Provides additional resources
  • Connects to key concepts
  • Shares personal or professional experiences
  • Contributes new information or perspective
  • Presents a competing viewpoint

/16 pts.

Support from Learning Resources

4PointsTotal

At least one post refers tocourse learning resources./4 pts.

Professional Writing

4points

Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors.

Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others./4 pts.Total40 points possible/40 pts.

NEED HELP?

FACULTY

Sladan Sinanovic

Looking for tutoring?Free, online, 24/7 tutoring on a variety of subjects. Go to Smarthinking >>