When a confession is used as evidence, corroborating evidence must also be provided to prove corpus delicti (that the crime was committed). The courts have ruled that a confession alone will not susta

When a confession is used as evidence, corroborating evidence must also be provided to prove corpus delicti (that the crime was committed). The courts have ruled that a confession alone will not sustain a conviction. What are the concerns that have been expressed in allowing a confession alone to sustain a confession? Do you feel that these concerns are legitimate? Why or why not?