Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.

QUESTION

Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper analyzing the 2016 Alaska Supreme Court case, Thomas v. Archer. Include the following in your analysis: 1. Did Dr. Archer breach her fiduciary duty to the Thomases? 2. D

Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper analyzing the 2016 Alaska Supreme Court case, Thomas v. Archer. Include the following in your analysis: 1. Did Dr. Archer breach her fiduciary duty to the Thomases? 2. Did the promise create an enforceable contract? 3. Should the promise be enforced through the doctrine of promissory stoppel ? 4. What others issues from an administrative or legal perspective be considered here? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper analyzing the 2016 Alaska Supreme Court case, Thomas v. Archer. Include the following in your analysis: 1. Did Dr. Archer breach her fiduciary duty to the Thomases? 2. Did the promise create an enforceable contract? 3. Should the promise be enforced through the doctrine of promissory stoppel ? 4. What others issues from an administrative or legal perspective be considered here? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Show more
Files: Question.docx
Geffmurimi
Geffmurimi
  • @
  • 1023 orders completed
ANSWER

Tutor has posted answer for $50.00. See answer's preview

$50.00

******** Supreme Court case ****** v ******************************************************* ******* ***** **** Thomas v ArcherIntroductionThe case of ****** * ****** *** ********* ruled wholly ** ***** ** ** Archer and *** ******** The lower Court *** ruled **** ***** *** no ******** *** doctor *** no ********* ************** *** **** *** law ** promissory ******** did not hold *** *** **** **** review *** ****** ***** ruled ** **** with the lower ***** **** finding it ** be in error ** *** ***** ** ********** ******** *** ******** aims ** ******* *** ******** issues ** *** **** and ****** *** ******** ** *** ********* ****** ********* *** ********* ******** ** * contract *** ********** of fiduciary ************** *** the ************ ** promissory ******** ****** ******** *** ******** ** *** ******* CourtPart *** Archer *** not breach *** ********* responsibility to *** Thomases * fiduciary **** ** an existing ************ ******* two ******* that ******** *** ** the parties ** *** in *** best ******** ** *** ***** party ** **** ***** the ********* responsibility requires that *** ***** **** *** have * ******** ** ******** when addressing *** ***** of *** ********* ***** ***** The ************ ** ******* **** *** ****** ** ***** confidence *** ******** * person ******** *** fiduciary responsibility **** *** relationship with the ********* ** ** ******** **** take ******* or make ********* **** *** *********** ** *** ********* * breach ** the ********* **** should ******* the ********* ** * third party * fiduciary relationship ****** ******* *** ******** *** ** ****** ** ** ******* ******* ** ** ********** role as * ********* **** implies **** ** Archer ****** **** *** *********** **** interest when offering them treatmentAccordingly ** Archer did *** *** *** Thomases * fiduciary ************** ** contacting ***** ********* ******* Physicians ** ***** ******* fiduciary ********** are *** ******** ** contact *** insurance ********* ** ***** of *** patient They are *** *********** *** ******** the ******** ****** on ***** financial ******* **** fiduciary ************* between *** patient *** the ********* ******* ****** ******* ********* and offering ******* ****** Dr ****** *** ********** her ********* ************** **** *** *********** **** *** ******** transfer ** another facility The ********* ************** **** *** extend ****** the scope ** offering ***** ******* ********* *** expertise **** ****** ******* ** ******* *** ******* *** *********** treatment *** ********** *********** of ***** ********* **** *** ******** already **** the ********** for **************** ****** they **** to *** ******** ***** ****** *** *** **** ** inform **** **** **** had ** request *** preauthorization within *** ****** ** ********* responsibility It is ********* ********** **** *** **** ** ********* *** insurance ******* was **** *** ******** *** not **** Dr ****** ***** ********* responsibility ** ******* ** *** duties ** ******** ******* treatment and expertisePart 2The ******* **** ** ****** **** **** *** surmount ** * ******** since ** **** *** ******* *** the ******** ******** for ** ** ** ***** *** *** ***** ******** ** a ******** *** *** ***** ********** *** ************* ******** ***** ***** ***** Dr ****** ******* ** ****** *** insurance ******* ** ****** ** *** ******** *** Thomases *** ******** ** ***** *** ******** ****** being ******* *** ********* **** their ******* ***** will be refunded ** ****** **** ** ***** ** the *** that she **** ********** their financial ******** *** Thomases ** *** ***** **** showed ********** **** **** ******** **** the ******** They **** the hospital ******** **** ***** financial grievances *** **** ********* ******* ** ********** ***** The main ***** **** *** ******** is that it did *** have *** ************* *** *** ******** ** *** ********* ***** ***** *** Thomases ***** *** no ***** in the ******** ***** ****** *** benefit ***** suffice *** *** ******** ** *** doctorThe ******** *** ** consideration ** confer ** *** ******** ** the doctor ** ****** *** not ***** ** ******* from ********* *** ********* ******* *** had no ****** ******** in *** ********* ** *** ******** *** absence of *** ************* ***** **** no ******** exists between the doctor and *** patients ***** is ** ******** between *** ******** *** the ******** *** ** the ******* ** ************* *** hospital ** ** *** gains **** *** *********** ** ***** **** **** ** ********* ******** ** ****** *** ******** ******* ** ******* hospital ** is even detrimental ** their ********** ***** ** ***** **** **** *** incapable ** handling *********** ***** *** concern *** *** ******** at the **** *** ** ********* immediate treatment for *** ***** That ******** **** **** ***** **** left for ******* ********* despite *** absence of any assurance ** ******* *** ********* was ******* and ***** *** ** ********** *** *** ******** It ** **** possible ** *** **** *** ******* ** *** situation ****** *** doctor ** **** *********** **** were *** reasonable ** ***** *** ******* ** get on the Medivac ** ** ******** ** ******** **** *** hospital *** *** ****** ******* ************* ** *** **** ** ****** *** ******* ******* at another ****** *** **** ** ******** ** *** accurate ***** *** ******** and the ****** have ** ****** ** ******** ********* **** **** ********* ** ************* *** ******** is ********* ******* ***** ** **** ******** *** ******** and ****** ** ************* ** *** ******** ** ** ArcherPart **** ******** can enforce the promise Dr ****** **** ******* the ******** ** ********** ******** Promissory ******** ****** *** *********** of a ******* despite the ******* of ******** ******** ** * ******** *** ******** ** ********** ******** ****** ***** *** ******** ** ***** ***** ******** *** ***** financial issues Promissory ******** *** ******* *** requirement ** ************* **** ********* * ******* *** ******** have to ***** *** ******** ** the ***** ******** **** *** required ****** enforcing *** *********** ***** ******* is **** *** ******** *** ********** ************ that the promise **** ****** the ******** ****** ******** ***** The Thomases *** ********** ************ **** ** ****** will ****** ***** predicament ** *** ********* ******* **** **** **** *** ******** ***** receiving the ********* **** ** ****** and the ******** **** sort ***** ********* issues ** *** ********* company failed *** ****** element ** that *** promise ****** ****** action Dr Archer’s promise prompted *** ******** to ** **** *** ******* *** made the *********** not ** ****** *** ********* ******* ****** *** ** ***** *** ***** ******* is that ********* should ** ******* if *** ******* ** enforced ** ********** ******* to ****** *** ********* company *** to ** ********* that required the Thomases ** *** **** *** *** the ******* ***** ***** *** *** ***** ******** arise *** ******** *** ******* *** ******* ******* *** ******** ** promissory ************ 4: ConclusionThe ***** ****** ************ ** *** ****** ** contract ******** ********** ******** *** fiduciary duty Another ******** ****** of exploration is *** validity ** *** **** ******** Most of the ********* was in **** **** *** ***** ***** worth noting ** *** document that *** ******** ****** ********* *** ******** **** *** ********* ************** ***** *** Medivac *** ***** ***** ***** addressing ** *** limitations ** Dr ****** as ** ***** of the ******** Was *** ***** ** ***** **** an ********* ** behalf ** the hospital? ReferencesFinn P (2016) Public ****** *** ********* relations In Fiduciary duty *** *** *********** ***** *** ****** **************** * (2018) Promissory Estoppel Wisconsin Law JournalHoffman * * ***** ***** * * ****** ******** Consideration *** ******** *** **** * *** 85 *****

Click here to download attached files: Alaska Supreme Court case.docx
or Buy custom answer
LEARN MORE EFFECTIVELY AND GET BETTER GRADES!
Ask a Question