Write a 4 page essay on The morality of vegetarianism.Download file to see previous pages... This argument indicates that the need for animal nutrients is not an important factor since the nutrients c

Write a 4 page essay on The morality of vegetarianism.

This argument indicates that the need for animal nutrients is not an important factor since the nutrients can be replaced by vegetable nutrients (Singer 172). The dietary needs of a human individual can be completely met by using vegetarian diets and nutrients, therefore, the need for animal killing can be explained as a form of luxury. Thus, it can be deduced that humankind has no real basis for insisting on animal flesh consuming since the sustenance gotten from meat can be replaced in some form. Stephens (8) also supports this argument in his summary of the arguments for vegetarianism, stating that there is no conclusive evidence that not eating meat will adversely affect an individual. Curtin (242) states that moral vegetarianism is an issue that should be taken into consideration by humankind when deciding on the source of sustenance since it is expected that an individual will consider the type of nutrients sought from an animal.

The moral argument for vegetarianism can also be supported by considering the feminist considerations for vegetarianism, arguments that purport that animal cruelty is supported by male individuals as a means of supporting some sort of anti-feminism. Curtin (244) introduces the issue of ecofeminism and goes on to state that the care approach introduced by eco-feminism is a defense of the ethics behind vegetarianism. According to Singer (170), equality is a form of morality, and the concern for all individual and organisms should not be based solely on their physical attributes. ...

This argument indicates that the need for animal nutrients is not an important factor, since the nutrients can be replaced by vegetable nutrients (Singer 172). The dietary needs of a human individual can be completely met by using vegetarian diets and nutrients, therefore, the need for animal killing can be explained as form of luxury. Thus, it can be deduced that humankind has no real basis for insisting on animal flesh consuming, since the sustenance gotten from meat can be replaced in some form. Stephens (8) also supports this argument in his summary of the arguments for vegetarianism, stating that there is no conclusive evidence that not eating meat will adversely affect an individual. Curtin (242) states that moral vegetarianism is an issue that should be taken into consideration by humankind when deciding on the source of sustenance, since it is expected that an individual will consider the type of nutrients sought from an animal. The moral argument for vegetarianism can also be supported by considering the feminist considerations for vegetarianism, arguments that purport that animal cruelty is supported by male individuals as a means of supporting some sort of anti-feminism. Curtin (244) introduces the issue of eco-feminism, and goes on to state that the care approach introduced by eco-feminism is a defense of the ethics behind vegetarianism. This view can be supported by Singer’s theory of morality, where the equality debate is introduced. According to Singer (170), equality is a form of morality, and the concern for all individual and organisms should not be based solely on their physical attributes.