Write a 6 page essay on 'jumping to conclusion': an investigation of the jump to conclusion bias.Download file to see previous pages... Clinical patients suffering from anxiety and other psychological

Write a 6 page essay on 'jumping to conclusion': an investigation of the jump to conclusion bias.

Clinical patients suffering from anxiety and other psychological prejudices are more susceptible to being trapped in this phenomenon. On these grounds, I have proposed to carry out a research study which shall verify the hypothesis that significant proportion of people are vulnerable to tendency to jump to conclusions, further investigating the reasons for such partiality. Literature review a) Hypothesis Various studies have been conducted that support the thesis that people suffering from delusional disorders require less amount of information while taking hasty decisions (Fine et al., 2007). Experiments have been carried out using beads task, mostly concluding that 50%–60% of clinical patients only request for 1 or 2 beads to make the final call on the contrary to the other 20%–30% in healthier participants (Moritz and Woodward, 2005). Moreover, even psychosis-prone persons have occasionally demonstrated the JTC conditions when tested through beads experiments (Colbert &amp. Peters, 2002). However, there have been varying views about causes of these symptoms and there is still an ongoing debate in this regard. Mostly researchers blame induced anxiety to be the root cause of increased state paranoia and JTC in majority of the cases. Past studies suggest that threat-related perceptions alongwith state anxiety are readily accepted by people who are more inclined to jump to conclusions. Therefore, most of the results indicate delusional disorders to be more closely correlated to JTC condition than schizophrenic effects (Peters et al., 2008). On the contrary, Hemsley suggested that irregularity of decision-making is a product of cognitive dysfunction that arises from schizophrenia (Hemsley, 2005). Another research shows that JTC is found mostly to be demonstrated by individuals that are suffering from psychosis (Broome et al., 2007) and also, as claimed by Van Dael, by people who are closely related or acquainted with such individuals (Van Dael et al., 2006). A study on reasoning explained that the normal state of reasoning involves accepting those taken-for-granted assumptions subconsciously that don’t occur to people explicitly and are considered by them to be unworthy of consideration. Thus, on basis of these, such individuals make erroneous judgments by skipping some essential intermediate steps of decision-making process. Masses tend to blindly rely on their cognitive skills to think before taking any critical steps and therefore fail to judge circumstances often. Various experiments have been conducted that required participants to consider all the available pieces of information when planning and analyzing given problem and to acknowledge the need for reasoning (Bach, 1984). Lastly, Freeman proposed that studies have not yet been able to draw a relationship between need for closure and JTC and further research is necessary to establish the underlying reasons for JTC bias (Freeman et al., 2008). b) Limitations Past researches carried out to test similar hypothesis have demonstrated various limitations in their methods and results generated. Firstly, the population utilized for experiments has been specific to subjective selection of population containing specific demographic attributes and therefore cannot be easily projected to general public. Secondly, most of the experiments claim that anxiety has been the primary reason for psychological and emotional conditions.