Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on one flew over the cuckoo's nest as an evidence of inhumanity of psychiatric treatment.
Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on one flew over the cuckoo's nest as an evidence of inhumanity of psychiatric treatment. The film version of a cult novel by Ken Kesey produced a powerful impact on the general public and made people reconsider some of their stereotypes. Viewers are given a chance to observe the events taking place in a mental hospital, which seemed to be a reliable shelter for the main character, Randle McMurphy. Being certainly unaware of possible consequences, he was simulating madness in order to escape imprisonment. This hospital turns out to be a peculiar model of society with similar processes. Nevertheless, at certain point viewers arrive at the conclusion that the society may be called a model of a mental hospital too. These two categories reverse their roles. Patients of a mental health clinic are not insane indeed. They are volunteers to stay there because this institution happened to be the only shelter for them. However, absurd society norms overtake them even in the asylum. They are trapped in a vicious circle of both their personal and collective madness. There is no alternative. Only two variants may be chosen – either to become a victim of electric shock therapy or to undergo total manipulation and brainwashing.
Forman raises a lot of issues related to inner conflicts of personality and illustrates the way a person interacts with the external environment. Personal freedom may be considered as one of the central issues. Freedom enables people to make a conscious choice of their lifeway and range of activities. A person may be considered free only in case if he or she is unaffected by any imposed opinions and is able to take all the decisions individually, without pressure from any external factors. However, personal freedom is always limited by socially accepted rules.
The free person may choose the way of behavior and course of actions in a variety of situations. In other words, free people cannot occupy a passive position. On the contrary, such a person is always active and conscious about the possible consequences of committed actions. Thus, freedom presupposes responsibility for performed deeds. . .
