Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Benchmark - Instructional Strategies for Secondary EducationDue Date: Sep 24, 2018 Max Points: 300Details:When designing inclusive learning experiences, a teacher needs to understand student co
Benchmark - Instructional Strategies for Secondary Education
Due Date: Sep 28, 2018 Max Points: 300Details:
When designing inclusive learning experiences, a teacher needs to understand student commonalities and differences to enable and enhance learning. An effective teacher considers multiple perspectives and diverse backgrounds when planning instruction.
For this assignment, based on the knowledge and skills you have gained in the course:
- Develop a 5-day mini-unit that implements five different instructional strategies. The unit plan should be in the grade level and content area that matches your field experience placement. You must use these required strategies: direct instruction, cooperative learning, discovery learning, jigsaw, and higher level questioning.
- Use the “COE Lesson Plan Template” for each lesson. The template must be filled out completely and you must attach all presentations, handouts, and assessments. If you are using websites or videos, provide a link to those sites in the lesson plan template.
- Be sure you are considering the unique learning needs of each student. Pay special attention to the appropriateness and effectiveness of the learning experiences planned. In addition, you must guide students in the use of technological tools to gather and utilize the information they need.
- Your unit plan needs a cover sheet that outlines the grade level, subject area, and topic that you are covering in the unit. The audience for this lesson would be the classroom you are currently completing your field experience in – these students are the students you would plan this unit for. Collaborate with your mentor teacher where appropriate.
- Additionally, in a 500-750 word reflection explain how you would determine your students’ mastery of content for the instructional strategies used. Identify acceptable evidence of mastery for each lesson and explain how your assessment(s) of the students’ mastery supports their intellectual, social, and/or physical development. Explain how understanding cultural, ethnic, gender, and learning differences create a more relevant learning experience and promote ethical practice. Finally, include your strategies for collaboration with colleagues for the proper execution of your unit plan.
Cite and reference 5-7 scholarly sources. Add to your notebook as necessary.
While APA format is not required for this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turniitin.
RUBRIC
Benchmark - Instructional Strategies for Secondary Education
1No Submission0.00%
2Insufficient69.00%
3Approaching74.00%
4Acceptable87.00%
5Target100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
20.0 %Multiple Perspectives [COE 1.3; InTASC 2(d)]
No submission
The mini-unit vaguely or scarcely considers multiple perspectives. Attention to individual differences or backgrounds is deficient.
The mini-unit plan considers multiple perspectives at a basic level. Some individual differences are considered. An attempt to ensure an inclusive environment is apparent. Some supporting details are present.
The mini-unit plan shows acceptable evidence of the consideration of multiple perspectives. Attention to individual differences and backgrounds is evident. The plan for instruction allows for an inclusive learning environment. Supporting details are sufficient. Plan is complete.
The mini-unit plan shows evidence of the inclusion and consideration of multiple perspectives. Special attention to individual differences and backgrounds is evident. The plan for instruction allows for a noticeably inclusive learning environment. Supporting details are sufficient and pertinent. Plan is insightful, complete, and creative.
20.0 %Appropriate Effective Learning Experiences [COE 3.6; InTASC 2(f), 7(e), 9(c), 10(a), 10(b)]
No submission
The mini-unit plan vaguely or scarcely includes learning experiences that meet unique learning needs. The reflection provides inadequate details regarding collaboration with colleagues for the proper execution of the unit plan.
The mini-unit plan outlines instructional strategies or methods that could potentially result in effective learning experiences. The reflection includes basic plans for collaboration with colleagues for the proper execution of the unit plan. Some supporting details are present.
The mini-unit plan presents instructional planning and design that is conducive to effective learning experiences to meet unique learning needs. The planned learning experiences are appropriate and effective. The reflection includes plans to collaborate with colleagues for the proper execution of the unit plan. Supporting details are sufficient. Plan is complete.
The mini-unit plan presents instructional planning and design that is conducive to effective learning experiences to meet unique learning needs. The planned learning experiences are appropriate and effective, utilizing suitable instructional strategies and methods. The reflection includes detailed plans to collaborate with colleagues for the proper execution of the unit plan. Supporting details are sufficient and pertinent. Plan is insightful, complete, and creative.
15.0 %Technology Tools and Information [COE 3.7; InTASC 8(g)]
No submission
The mini-unit plan vaguely or scarcely guides learners on the use of technology when interacting with content area information.
The mini-unit plan provides basic guidance for learners on the use of technology tools when interacting with content area information. Some supporting details are present.
The mini-unit plan includes proper guidance for learners on the use of technology tools when interacting with content area information. Supporting details are sufficient. Plan is complete.
The mini-unit plan includes proper guidance for learners on the use of technology tools when interacting with content area information. Supporting details are sufficient and pertinent. Plan is insightful, complete, and creative.
15.0 %Reflection and Deeper Understanding [COE 4.2; InTASC 9(e)]
No submission
The mini-unit plan is deficient on considerations regarding cultural, ethnic, gender, or learning differences. The reflection provides a vague explanation of how understanding learner differences allows for relevant learning experiences and promotes ethical practice.
The mini-unit plan provides basic considerations for cultural, ethnic, gender, or learning differences, as they relate to the learning experiences. The reflection provides limited reasoning on the significance of understanding learner differences and teaching practice. Some supporting details are present.
The mini-unit plan exhibits a consideration of cultural, ethnic, gender, and learning differences. The reflection provides an explanation of how understanding learner differences allows for relevant learning experiences and affects teaching practice. Supporting details are sufficient.
The mini-unit plan provides evidence of consideration of cultural, ethnic, gender, and learning differences, relevant to the learning experiences. The reflection provides an explanation of how understanding learner differences allows for relevant learning experiences and promotes ethical practice. Supporting details are sufficient and pertinent.
10.0 %Research Citations and Format
No submission
Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken.
Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken.
All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.
All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
No submission
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Mechanics
No submission
The lesson plans contain inappropriate, incoherent language and/or sentence structures.
The lesson plans contain mechanical and conventional errors or non-relevant language that affects meaning and clarity.
The lesson plans have a few mechanical and conventional errors present that do not significantly affect meaning or clarity. Word choice reflects basic, consistent, appropriate use of practice and topic-related language.
The lesson plans are free of mechanical and conventional errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and topic-related language.
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
No submission
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
100 %Total Weightage
