Answered You can buy a ready-made answer or pick a professional tutor to order an original one.
COMPETENCY RESTORATION
Assignment 2: Competency Restoration
If criminal defendants are deemed incompetent to face a trial, they have the right to have their competency restored since they cannot be released without having a trial and they cannot be held indefinitely without being given the opportunity to become competent. Accordingly, it is important to state how they will be restored to competency.
Create a 3- to 4-page paper in a Microsoft Word document answering the two parts of this assignment.
Part 1:
CST has long been a sought-out legal procedure. Identify a landmark case decision that has played a factor in this process and address the following issues:
- Explain the process of competency restoration.
- Describe why the process of competency restoration is important.
- Discuss one landmark case decision that has played a role in the process of restoration.
Part 2:
Elaborate on your discussion by including the process of restoration in the forensic arena.
In your report, address the following:
- Identify the appropriate APA ethical codes and the specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists that may apply to the process of restoration.
- Examine the limits to confidentiality.
- Identify the factors that might impede competency restoration.
Your responses should rely upon at least three scholarly resources from the professional literature that are cited in APA format. The literature may include the Argosy University online library resources; relevant textbooks; peer-reviewed journal articles; and websites created by professional organizations, agencies, or institutions (.edu and .gov).
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Explained the process of competency restoration.
16
Described why the process of competency restoration is important.
14
Discussed one landmark case on competency restoration.
14
Identified the appropriate APA ethical codes and the specialty guidelines on the process of competency restoration.
12
Examined the limits to confidentiality.
12
Identified the factors that might impede competency restoration.
12
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
20
Total:
100
- @
- 12 orders completed
- ANSWER
-
Tutor has posted answer for $10.00. See answer's preview
********** ********************** ************** affiliateIntroductionThe ******* ***** ***** * *** ** **** with ********** Restoration *** * *** ** ***** ***** without the ******* ******** its self * pretrial ********** ********** group **** ********** fundamentally on competency appraisal of rebuilding ***** *** ***** **** begin with * ***** introduction ** **** ********** *********** ** **** ******* *** ******* ** competency *********** ********** of ********** restoration ******* a ****** ******* of **** ******** that *** played * role in *** ******* of *********** ******* **** ***** ****** ********** *********** *** ethical ***** ****** ** *************** ******* ******* that ***** impede ********** restorationBrief description of ********** restorationCompetency *********** ** *** *** ** healing * ****** *** *** **** ******** ** ******** ******** ** *** ***** *** ******** *** stand trial *** ***** crime ****** ******* ***** *** **** of ***** passed ******* *** ******* ******* ******* **** **** **** ************ are *********** ******* ******* ******** ill It ******* **** **** ********** *** ******* against them *** *** **** ***** ********** ****** **** *** *** ******* ** the ****** **** *** stand ***** *** ******* ******* ** ** *** **** ** them ** **** ******* **** the cause of their ***** *** ** * result ** ***** ****** illness *** **** ****** ********** ** referrals to forensic ****** ****** ************* is *** *********** ** ********** ** ***** trial ***** ***** ****** **** of ***** ********* *** seen ** ******** to ******** ***** ********** ******** ** stand trial might ** ********* ** ********* *** preparing to empower **** ** continue to ***** ***** **** is **** * ******* ** ********** **************** ******* ** ********** **************** *** ******** ** arrested the offender ** interviewed by **** her ****** ****** *** ** ******** realizes that *** offender has * ****** illness that ***** *** ******* to stand trial *** ****** ******** requests *** ** evaluation *** ***** gives the State * grace ****** ** ******* **** ********** ** * ********* of the ********** *** ********** utilizes * database ** track *** ********* ******* ** ****** illness *** ****** *** subject's ******** ******* *** restorative records After **** the ********** ******* the ****** then interviews *** ******** *** *** ** *** ***** ***** **** interview *** ****** ****** * report **** ***** ** assurance of ******* *** ******** ** ********* to stand ******* the ****** party can ***** trial ** continues ** the ********* ********* ******* *** ***** ********* ** the *** chance that he ** ******** ** be *********** ** stand ***** *** ********** **** ** ** ***** ** ******** for ********* **** *** *********** **** he **** **** his ********** ************* ** after the period of therapy in the hospital the ******** ** ***** *********** ** *** be held *** **** **** On *** off ****** **** despite ********** he ***** skilled ** stand ***** ** can ** held *** **** days ** the *** chance **** ** ** * legal ******* **** ** *** ******* can ** ******** against him **** ** **** the understanding **** *** ****** ***** **** ****** **** ** ****** ** *** ******* Center ** their ******** ***************** ** ********** *********** ************* *** has **** ******** ** competency *********** ***** that *** ************ of **** exposure ** *** ********* of *** reason for ********* *** *** ********** securities ******* by ***** ******** approving *** ********* Competency *********** ***** *** offender ** ****** ********** so ** ** **** **** from **** ********** *** ********* **** *** ******* ** procedural ****** ******* * defendant proceeding ** ***** *** ********** of ********** *********** ******* ********** ** the administration ** ******* ** ***** ** ********** ******** ********** ** *** ethical *************** ** ************* ********** ******** ******** ** the ********** procedureLandmark **** ********** ******* of landmark case ******** **** *** ****** a **** ** the ******* ** restoration ** * **** ******* ** **** * ******** **** ******** ** US ******* ***** v ******** ***** In **** case *** ** ******* Court held **** *** ******* ** ********** might be ****** ** *** **** during the ******** procedures ******** **** **** **** the ***** *** a ********** to ***** ** *** ***** ***** being ********** **** proof **** ***** ***** a **** **** uncertainty with ******* to *** ************ ********** regardless ** ******* resistance ****** ***** for * competency ********** The court's ******* *** **** ******* ** observe ********** ************ ** ****** a *********** ********* *** to ** ***** ** ********* ***** ****** to ***** ***** ** * *********** of *** ****************** *** ******* ******* **** the ****** **** ** American ************** Society (2011) ********* **** ******** ************* ** *** ** *** ******** *** ******* ****** and ******** ********* **** may ***** ** **** ********* *** ***** *** ethical ********* *** Forensic ********** ******* ***** ******** **** That ** concerned **** ***** ************* for ******** ********* ************* Affiliation 2010) ******* Principle **** ********** (American Psychological *********** ***** ***** is also *** **** ** **** ********* *** ****** of *************** (American Psychology-Law Society ***** ******* APA ******* codes ******** (APA's) ***** ********* ** ********** and **** ** ****** ****** ********** **** ********** respect individuals’ ***** ** self-sufficiency ******* and ****** 2005)Limit ** ********************* of confidentiality *** examined ******* in **** **** each state forces distinctive ********** ****** of confinement ** ******** *** ********* ********** ************ *** ************ ***** moral ******** ********** confidentiality ******* ***** ** ** ** indicated by ****** ****** in early 70's Psychologist believed ** *** ************ ** ***** ********* *********** However they ******* **** *** new legitimate requests for ********** *** **** ** *************** limitation ***** ****** it's **** ** * ******* displays **** ** *** or *** health ** *** ****** is ***** ***** ******* such **** **** ** ******** *********** to *** ****** ****** *************** *** **** ** limited *************** *** **** ****** its **** ** *** ****** ******** victim’s *********** without *** ******* *** situation ********** **** *** ******** has little ********** ***** ****** ********* *********** a psychological ******** Assessment *** *** ************ ** that **** ***** ***** ******* **** ** introduced ** the ************ **** might ****** ********** restorationMany ******* influence ********** ************ ***** may ******* ************ ******** *** ********* ******* a ******** of mental ******* ******** history ***** **** ****** ********** *********** *** also ** influenced by *** ******* ** which *********** treatment ******* ************ ******** ***** competency-restoration ******** which are ** ***** ********* ***** *********** ***** *********** ********** their ********* are ******** ***** ********** ******* that ****** ********** *********** ******** picking *** ******* candidates *** the ******* ******** ** keep ** ********* ******* treaters and ********** ********** ********** *** *********** ********** **** ***** **** ***** factors ReferencesAnderson * * ***** Hewitt * (2002) *** ****** ** competency restoration ******** on ********** with ****** *********** found *** ********* ** proceed *** *** ***** Behavior ***** ************** * * ******** J * ****** * * *************** * ****** * * & ******* L ****** Effect of an individualized ********* program *** the restoration of ********** ** ***** trial in pretrial ******** patients Journal of *** ******** ******* ** ********** *** the *** ***** ************ K * **** * * ***** Ronan * * ****** ********** ************ ** *********** ** *** differences ******* ********** ********* restorable and *** restorable to ************* *** ***** ************* ********* M * Kurth * Cadle * ***** ****** J ****** Competency courts: A creative ******** for ********* ********** ** the ******* ** skillsBehavioral sciences ***** the law27(5) *************