Waiting for answer This question has not been answered yet. You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Consider the following simple situation: quot;The initial distribution of resources is just.
1. Consider the following simple situation:
"The initial distribution of resources is just. Suppose a large number of people are willing to pay 10 cents directly to LeBron James in addition to the standard ticket price in order to watch him play basketball. Suppose one million people do this during the course of the season and James will acquire additional personal wealth of $100,000. As a consequence of the volunteer actions of James and his one million fans, a new distribution of resources has emerged."
1.1 How would you view a redistributive tax scheme that taxes James' additional personal wealth of $100,000?
1.2 What would be Nozick's view on such a redistributive tax scheme above? Explain briefly.
1.3 What would be Rawls' view on such a redistributive tax scheme above? Explain briefly.
1.4 How would you change your view if you learned that the initial distribution of resources was not just? How would Nozick change his view? How about Rawls? Explain briefly.