Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
I will pay for the following essay Article Review 1. The essay is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.Download file to see previous pages... Document
I will pay for the following essay Article Review 1. The essay is to be 5 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.
Download file to see previous pages...Document Assessment The writers of this document were Fitzpatrick, Winston and Mooney. Fitzpatrick is a fellow at BreastCheck that is the Irish National Breast Screening Programme. He has accreditations from the UCD School of Public Health &. Population Science and the University College Dublin. Presently, he practices his medical career in the Republic of Ireland. Winston belongs to the National Cancer Screening Service of the Public of Ireland, as well. The authors wrote the document on January 17, 2007 in the Republic of Ireland (Fitzpatrick, Winston, &. Mooney, 2008). The intended audiences for this study were women aged between fifty and sixty four-year olds. They were limited audiences, specifically comprising of two thousand women who had recently been screened for cancer by BreastCheck. The authors assumed that the audience is informed about the benefits of breast cancer screening. According to them, the only point of concern is their attitude towards the gender of the radiographers for mammography. This assumption might affect the presentation of materials because it is likely to leave out a critical mass of the respondents failed to acknowledge the benefits of breast cancer screening. The basic story line of the document revolves around the screening of women by BreastCheck (Fitzpatrick, Winston, &. Mooney, 2008). ...
The study also sought to find out if their screenings were from a mobile unit or a static place. The important people here are the women who attend the cancer screening and the male mammography radiography. The authors’ thesis statement is to study the attitude of women towards the gender of the radiographer and the uptake of the breast screening. This can be attested to by the design of the questionnaires (Fitzpatrick, Winston, &. Mooney, 2008). Document Interpretation The foremost reason behind the writing of this document was to relay the actual state of affairs regarding the attitude women had towards the gender of mammography radiographers. The policy makers will then respond to the screening dynamics through initiating the appropriate actions. Additionally, the document intended to present social disparities that characterize the search for medical attention among women. However, the critical intent of the document was to convince the audiences that the number of women seeking breast cancer screening services is rapidly expanding. This implies that the number of mammography radiographers will have to be doubled to meet the rising demand. Consequently, women are encouraged to understand the situation and begin to change their attitudes and embrace male mammography radiographers. The authors also argued that despite the negative attitudes that some women have towards the male mammography radiographers, close to third of the proportion of women screened do not mind about the gender of the radiographers. I share the authors’ line of argument. This is because the medical profession is rapidly growing and becoming dynamic.
