Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Write a 10 page essay on Logistics Global Supply Chain Management.Schulz (2001) described knowledge as the accumulated data of “know-how and information transferred per unit of time”. He intended
Write a 10 page essay on Logistics Global Supply Chain Management.
Schulz (2001) described knowledge as the accumulated data of “know-how and information transferred per unit of time”. He intended to capture all modes of information transfer in this definition by using the word “know-how” for example email, phone, meetings, policy revisions etc. . Gupta and Govindarajan (2000) defined a global supply chain as a set of units in different countries that work over a network of capital, product, and knowledge transactions. Mindbaeva (2003) described the creation and transfer of information across a global supply chain as the process of identifying useful information (tacit and explicit knowledge both) that is transferred to another unit in the world. The transfer process will continue until it finally reaches the desired destination. Nonaka (1990) termed this process as global knowledge creation.
Tacit knowledge is the end product of the information in the minds of the people. Smith (n.d.) stated that it is greatly influenced by the experiences of the individual. This kind of knowledge is very difficult to accumulate since it has to be put in a recordable form first and requires great motivation or incentives to share it with others. The sharing of this knowledge requires a level of trust among the participating entities. Explicit knowledge is the knowledge that can be disseminated and stored easily. Sanchez (2003) explained that information systems store this kind of information as it can be stored in the form of drawings, documents, sheets etc. The creation of both of these types of knowledge takes place at the global supply chains units and needs to be transferred amongst each other effectively.
Nonaka (1990) added an important factor in this process which is the capability of the receiver to use the information in the best manner. Davenport and Prusak (1997) agreed with Nonaka (1990) that mere transfer of the information is not enough if it is not absorbed by the receiver and more importantly if it is not acted upon for the betterment of the organization.
