Answered You can hire a professional tutor to get the answer.
Write a 68 pages paper on situation of human rights in the uk in the presence of anti: terrorism and other privacy invading regulations.
Write a 68 pages paper on situation of human rights in the uk in the presence of anti: terrorism and other privacy invading regulations. The country has captured some of those suspected terrorists, and as part of its obligations to protect the rights of everyone, UK resident or non-resident, the authorities face some serious problems in the prosecution, which has also resulted in a series of complaints and appeals coming from the detainees or those suspects under detention.
In defending the lives and properties of the people, the Government is faced with serious problems as security and liberty are sometimes in conflict, or there seems to be an exchange of liberty and security in the pursuit of the war on terror. This exchange has been seen by many countries as needed and must be done in order to save lives and institute the rule of law.
Enacting laws to protect the public against terrorism carries a price which is the curtailment of individual freedom. Philip Thomas states that because of the increasing need for public safety, there is an accompanying reduction of individual freedom. In the war on terror, the interests of the majority supersede those of the individual, and this limits individual freedom and liberty.
States have the responsibility to protect their people from terrorists and terrorist organizations. Restriction of civil liberties cannot be avoided but should be enforced to the minimum. Likewise, states don’t only have the responsibility to protect human lives. they have to protect their people’s rights under threat by terrorists, as embodied by the international human rights law.
On the other hand, Dr. Wright-Neville, a former senior intelligence analyst for the Australian government, has said that the threats posed by terrorists may not be as pervasive as some have portrayed. Dr. Wright Neville states that this claim has little or no evidence but has created confusion by putting more power to the terrorists and conceding to the terrorists’ aim and objective to make people tremble in fear and over-react or ‘make fundamental errors of judgment.
