Why should the USA Pledge of Allegiance Be Revised, by Gwen Wilde Analysis: Issue: Should the Pledge of Allegiance be revised, omitting the words “under God”? Conclusion: Yes, the Pledge of Allegiance

********* *** ******** ****** *** not ******* *** ***** ******** God”2 The words ******** ****** are ************** *** ***** ******** God” are ********** ********* The ****** ******** *** Americans ** say ********* that **** Americans do not ******** *** ***** ******** ****** cannot be ******* in good faith ** **** ********** ******** * ******** of ********* *** **** **** * ********* affiliation ************ several million ********* do *** believe ** God7 ** one ******* silent ***** others *** ******** the ****** ** even ** *** ******* ****** **** ***** ****** *** speaking the ***** ******** ****** *** ** **** to *** ****** that *** ** *********** ** ************ to ****** *** Pledge ** ************** ** is a ********* observance *** ** ****** not be connected with religion9 **** ** announce **** ** ******* the **** *** **** ** are loyal ********* *** ** ****** *** also **** to ******** **** we **** a ********** ********* ****** ** **** **** a ****** in monotheism * ****** that ***** is * *** *** *** ******* ***** millions ** loyal ********* ****** say it ** ****** *** ** included in the ********* in ***** ********* ****** ***** ******* to *** ***** country11 ***** who **** ** ******** religion are ****** **** ** ** ** *** the place to ** ** ** *** in * pledge **** is ******** ** *** school-children *** ** *** *** citizensAmbiguous ********************** *** who determines what is *********** and **** ** inappropriate?Deeply religious *** people **** ********* *********** ** **** How ***** **** ** ***************** ** ********* *** *** **** ** * ********* ***** be *** or *** ******** ******* ** **** “approximately ******* ** *** **** *** ********* ** ******* *** **************** **** **** **** ** Christianity/religious *********** *** **** ** interpretation *********** ***** ** ** ************** we ****** ******* ******** Americans” because the ****** defines it *** us as ****** *** “respect *** ************* *********** ******* ** ************** ** choiceValue Conflict: ********************* Assumptions:(Reason ** *** The ********** ** **** ****** *** ** *** *** *** words ******** God” ** the ****** **** ******* **** ***** *** do *** the ************ ** *** The assumption ** **** ***** *** **** ********* *** **** can’t say *** words ******** ****** ******* **** lack * ************ ** *** *** ********** ** **** ** *** refrains **** ****** “under ****** they are called **************** ************ ** *** *** assumption ** **** ******** ***** and *** ****** ** ********** are ***** ******* of *** **** “God” ** *********** *** – *** ********** ** **** not *** ***** ********* **** * kinship to *** ************** ***************** ****** who *** be ****** **** ** ****** *** ******* **** their *********** ******* ***** ** * military draft which *** *** in ****** the **** **** ******* *** written **** *** one **** ** effect *** **** ** years!)EvaluationFallacies:(Reason 7) *** False ******* *** ****** *** *** ******** ****** *** are ********** ********* ** *** ******* say the words *** *** deemed ***************** ** ******* *** ******* pressure **** ****** *** *** *** bravest ** join ** *** *********************** ** ****** *** *********************** ** Popularity *** “70 ** **** *** of ********* *********** ******* – the ***** ***** God We ******** appear on *** moneyWishful ******** *** “reciting *** ****** ** to ** ***** ********* **** * **** awareness ** *** words”Evidence:Authority *** the United ****** ******** ******** the ****** ** the ** **** **** (4 *** * 2006) thus *** *** first **** ********** sanctioning *** ****** ****** ******* ** is * ********** ********* **** *** ***** to **** ******* *** this *********** ** ***************** – ** **** ********* ****** D ********** ******** ****** the ***** ******** ****** ******** ** ****** ******** ******* *** ******** ** able to **** changes *** **** *********** ** provableStatistics – ********* **** ** ** even *** ** ********* *** they are ********** **** **** form ** ************ and ************* ******* ** say **** are Jewish Weak ******** ***** *** she get *** percentages? **** **** a *** ** ************** *** *** ***** “In God ** ******** is ** ******** money ***** makes ** analogous ** ******** God” ** the Pledge **** ******* having ** ****** ** ***** ** affirmation ** **** different **** ****** ** ****** to **** ** *** phrase ******* ** ************** *** **** ******** *********** knows” **** ******* ***** is not ********** basis to *** ************** ****** *** ********** **** ** *** * ****** **************** Omitted *************** author ****** **** ****** *** ******** ** ***** *** don’t want to *** “under *********** ******* any ***** *********** ******** ********* people’s faith ********** paper is ****** the author’s ******* **** *********** included; what ***** ******* from *** ***** ********* *** *** **** **** about the ****** ** AllegianceIs *** ****** **** ******** for ******** *** **** includes *** opinions and her ******** without ********* to *** *********** or ****** *** ***** **** herMultiple *************** two versions of the ****** ** ********** ***** be ********** *** **** ***** ***** ******* ***** ****** ** ****** *** original ****** of *********** *** ****** ** ********** ***** be ********* the ****** * good critical *********** this ******* ******** that *** should ******* **** ********* and ****** **** *** are ********** ** the ****** *** ** *** ************ ** their ******** Good **** ** *** **** final ******* ***